From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Jaffe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1400 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1400 EFB P.

February 1, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(1)-(2).

On October 19, 2010, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff's claims against Doe defendants with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff did not file amended claims against these defendants within the allotted time, so claims against these defendants must be dismissed.

Plaintiff has also filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Jaffe from the case, stating that he has discovered that defendant Jaffe was not at fault.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Jaffe from this case is granted; and

2. His claims against Doe defendants and defendant Jaffe are hereby dismissed.

Dated: February 1, 2011.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Jaffe

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1400 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Jaffe

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. JAFFE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1400 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)