From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Ceccato

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
21-cv-09960-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-09960-JSW

06-27-2022

BRIAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. MARIE I. CECCATO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS ON COUNSEL RE: DKT. NOS. 22, 24

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received and considered Plaintiff's response to the Order to Show Cause issued on June 16, 2022, and it finds counsel's response inadequate. The Court refers responding counsel to responses submitted in Johnson v. PB Cutner/Coronado Group, LLC, No. 21-cv-4694-JSW and Gomez v. Wilson, No. 21-cv-8834-JSW for the type of response that the Court has found satisfactory. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY IMPOSES sanctions in the amount of $150.00 on Plaintiff's counsel, Prathima Price, to be paid to the Clerk of the Court by no later than July 5, 2022.

As noted in the orders, although the Court found good cause to discharge the orders to show cause without imposing sanctions, it will not hesitate to impose sanctions if plaintiff's counsel misses deadlines going forward.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Ceccato

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 27, 2022
21-cv-09960-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Ceccato

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. MARIE I. CECCATO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 27, 2022

Citations

21-cv-09960-JSW (N.D. Cal. Jun. 27, 2022)