From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2008
303 F. App'x 419 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-16876.

Submitted December 1, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 10, 2008.

Fred A. Whitaker, Oakland, CA, pro se.

Thomas A. Blake, Deputy Attorney General, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01618-PJH.

Before: GOODWIN, CLIFTON and BEA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and appellant's response to the court's order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment and the order denying appellant's motion for reconsideration.

Appellant's request for oral argument is denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2008
303 F. App'x 419 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Alameda Cnty

Case Details

Full title:Fred A. WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2008

Citations

303 F. App'x 419 (9th Cir. 2008)