Opinion
20442-18W
04-05-2022
ORDER
Albert G. Lauber, Judge.
On March 25, 2022, respondent filed, at docket entries 87 and 88, a reply to petitioner's opposition to respondent's motion for summary judgment and a second supplemental reference list of redacted information in support of the motion for summary judgment. On March 28, 2022, the Court received unredacted copies of these documents and filed them at docket entries 92 and 93.
On March 30, 2022, petitioner filed, at docket entry 90, a reply to respondent's response to petitioner's motion to compel production of documents. On March 28, 2022, the Court received an unredacted copy of this document and filed it at docket entry 94.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, at docket entry 92; respondent's Second Supplemental Reference List of Redacted Information in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, at docket entry 93; and petitioner's Reply to Response to Motion to Compel Production of Documents, at docket entry 94, are sealed and not made part of the Court's public record in this case. The sealed documents shall be retained by the Court in a sealed file which shall not be opened for inspection by any person or entity except by Order of the Court.