From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whisby v. Bank of Am., NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-55 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-55 (MTT)

12-07-2012

MARVIN L. WHISBY and COMEIKO R. WHISBY, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, PROMMIS SOLUTIONS, LLC, and JOHNSON & FREEDMAN, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

The Plaintiffs have asked the Court to "clarify" whether the dismissal of their action was with or without prejudice. (Doc. 32). As noted in the Court's Order of October 26, 2012, the Plaintiffs' claims against Prommis Solutions and Johnson & Freedman were dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiffs' claims against Bank of America were dismissed by Order dated June 20, 2012 because of pleading deficiencies. Accordingly, that dismissal was also without prejudice.

________________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Whisby v. Bank of Am., NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-55 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Whisby v. Bank of Am., NA

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN L. WHISBY and COMEIKO R. WHISBY, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-55 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2012)