From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 25, 1961
289 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 14365.

April 25, 1961.

Imogene Edla Whetstone, in pro. per.

A.D. Ruegsegger, Dyer, Meek, Ruegsegger Bullard, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, and McALLISTER and WEICK, Circuit Judges.


ORDER.

We find no error in the order of the District Court striking the complaints from the files for noncompliance with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Under all the circumstances of the case, we feel that the cause should not have been dismissed with prejudice and that appellant should have been granted leave to file a second amended complaint complying with said rules.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court dismissing the cause be vacated and the cause remanded with instructions to grant appellant leave to file her second amended complaint, complying with said rules, within 30 days.


Summaries of

Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 25, 1961
289 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Whetstone v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Company

Case Details

Full title:Imogene Edla WHETSTONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 25, 1961

Citations

289 F.2d 494 (6th Cir. 1961)