Summary
finding abuse of discretion dismissing under RCCH Rule 12(q) where record does not show court considered the Blaisdell factors and court fails to explain why less severe sanctions were insufficient
Summary of this case from Nakamoto v. Hilton Waikoloa Vill.Opinion
NO. CAAP-14-0000758
05-10-2017
On the briefs: R. Steven Geshell, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Charles A. Price, (Koshiba Price Gruebner & Mau), for Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee Title Guaranty Escrow Services, Inc. David J. Minkin, Jordon J. Kimura, and Jessica M. Wan (McCorriston Miller Mukai Mackinnon LLP), for Defendant/Cross-Claimant/ Cross-Claim Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee Island Title Corporation. Bruce H. Wakuzawa and (Law Office of Bruce H. Wakuzawa), Peter Knapman (Law Office of Peter Knapman), for Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants-Appellees Clinton Hinchcliff, Jr., Clinton Hinchcliff, Sr., and Hinchcliff Investments, LLC. John R. Remis, Jr. for Third-Party Defendant/Cross-Claimant-Appellee Nimble Land, Inc.
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
Vacate. Remand.