From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Price

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. WASHINGTON
Dec 13, 1898
41 A. 894 (R.I. 1898)

Opinion

December 13, 1898.

PRESENT: Matteson, C.J., Stiness and Tillinghast, JJ.

(1) Abduction. Remedies. Forms of Action. Case. Trespass. While case is a proper form of action for abducting the plaintiff's daughter, trespass is also an appropriate remedy.

TRESPASS for the abduction of the plaintiff's daughter. Certified from the Common Pleas Division and heard on substantial demurrer to the declaration.

Thomas H. Peabody, Nathan B. Lewis, and Warren W. Chase, for plaintiff.

Albert B. Crafts, for defendants.


This is an action of trespass for the abduction of the plaintiff's daughter. The defendants demur to the declaration, the ground of the demurrer being that the action should have been case and not trespass. Though the action might have been brought in case, trespass is also an appropriate remedy. 1 Chit. Pl. 16 Am. ed. 188; Chamberlain v. Hazelwood, 5 M. W. 515; Ditcham v. Bond, 2 Mau. Sel. 436; Hoover v. Heim, 7 Watts, Pa. 62.

Demurrer overruled, and case remitted to Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Price

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. WASHINGTON
Dec 13, 1898
41 A. 894 (R.I. 1898)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Price

Case Details

Full title:SYLVESTER WHEELER vs. WALTER A. PRICE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. WASHINGTON

Date published: Dec 13, 1898

Citations

41 A. 894 (R.I. 1898)
41 A. 894

Citing Cases

Bedard v. Notre Dame Hospital

In our opinion a determination of this ground of the demurrer is decisive of all the issues raised in this…