From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Majesky

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:20-cv-01705-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01705-TLN-JDP

09-20-2021

ZACKERY WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW MAJESKY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff proceeds in this civil rights action pro se. The matter was referred to a United Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302.

On August 20, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No. objections were filed.

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August 20, 2021, are ADOPTED;
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders;
3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Majesky

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:20-cv-01705-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Majesky

Case Details

Full title:ZACKERY WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW MAJESKY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01705-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)