From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. LG Elecs. U.S.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2022
1:22-cv-00459-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00459-ADA-BAM

11-28-2022

MARK WHEELER, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., Defendant.

HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Michael M. Maddigan Vassi Iliadis HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Phoebe A. Wilkinson* Samuel L. Zimmerman* Ian Lewis-Slammon* HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Counsel for Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. *Pro hac vice forthcoming Alex R. Straus MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Mitchell M. Breit* MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class *Pro hac vice forthcoming


Complaint Filed: April 19, 2022

Scheduling Conference: December 14, 2022

HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Michael M. Maddigan Vassi Iliadis HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Phoebe A. Wilkinson* Samuel L. Zimmerman* Ian Lewis-Slammon* HOGAN LOVELLS U.S. LLP Counsel for Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. *Pro hac vice forthcoming

Alex R. Straus MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Mitchell M. Breit* MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class *Pro hac vice forthcoming

JOINT STIPULATION TO REQUEST CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO A LATER DATE PENDING THE COURT'S RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION [Proposed Order]

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOINT STIPULATION

Plaintiff Mark Wheeler (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into this Joint Stipulation with reference to the following:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on April 19, 2022. See ECF No. 1;

WHEREAS, on August 5, 2022, Defendant filed its Motion to Transfer Venue or, In The Alternative, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (“Defendant's Motion”). See ECF No. 18;

WHEREAS, prior to the filing of Defendant's Motion, on August 2, 2022, the Parties requested that the Court continue the August 10, 2022 Initial Scheduling Conference and related deadlines until after the Court resolves Defendant's motion. See ECF No. 15;

WHEREAS, on August 4, 2022, the Court rescheduled the Initial Scheduling Conference to December 14, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. The Court further ordered the Parties to file a Joint Scheduling Report by December 7, 2022. See ECF No. 16;

WHEREAS, the parties completed briefing on Defendant's Motion on September 16, 2022, and Defendant's Motion remains pending before this Court;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court's Local Rules, and this Court's August 4, 2022 order, ECF No. 16, the Parties would be required to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference by November 23, 2022, submit a Joint Scheduling Report no later than December 7, 2022, and submit a proposed discovery plan no later than December 28, 2022;

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred about the continuance of the upcoming December 14, 2022 Initial Scheduling Conference and related deadlines and have agreed that a continuance is appropriate in light of Defendant's still-pending Motion;

WHEREAS, because Defendant's Motion is still pending, the Parties agree and respectfully request that the Court again continue the Initial Scheduling Conference and all related deadlines until after the Court issues a ruling on Defendants' Motion;

WHEREAS, the Parties' request for a continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference and related deadlines is not made for the purpose of delay. Instead, the Parties agree that these adjustments to the calendar will work to preserve the resources of the Parties and, more importantly, the Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD AND SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND JOINTLY REQUEST THAT, in order to conserve the resources of the Court and the Parties, the Court again continue the Initial Scheduling Conference and related deadlines until after it resolves Defendant's Motion.

Counsel for Plaintiff has reviewed this stipulation and concurs in its filing.

ORDER

Having read and considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Request Continuance of the Initial Scheduling Conference to a Later Date Pending the Court's Ruling on Defendant's Motion, and there appearing to be good cause for same, The Court hereby ORDERS:

The Initial Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for December 14, 2022 at 9:00 AM, is continued to April 18, 2023 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties shall file a Joint Scheduling Report at least one (1) full week prior to the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. LG Elecs. U.S.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2022
1:22-cv-00459-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Wheeler v. LG Elecs. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:MARK WHEELER, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-00459-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2022)