From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wheeler v. Hampson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 291 (Cal. 1860)

Opinion

         Appeal from the Twelfth District.

         Plaintiff had judgment below. Defendant appeals.

         Judgment reversed.

         COUNSEL

          Pixley & Smith, for Appellant.

          McDougal & Sharp, F. M. Haight, and Hoge & Wilson, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Baldwin, J. delivered the opinion of the Court. Field, C. J. concurring.

         OPINION

         BALDWIN, Judge

         This case involves the same principles as that of Hart v. Burnett, recently decided. The argument of respondent is addressed mainly to show that the title held by the city is not such as to exempt it from execution sale. This question was considered at great length in the case of Hart v. Burnett, and it is not considered necessary to go over the subject again. We are satisfied with the decision in that case, and reaffirm it now.

         Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Wheeler v. Hampson

Supreme Court of California
Jul 1, 1860
16 Cal. 291 (Cal. 1860)
Case details for

Wheeler v. Hampson

Case Details

Full title:WHEELER v. HAMPSON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 1, 1860

Citations

16 Cal. 291 (Cal. 1860)

Citing Cases

Riley v. Martinelli

An execution against a trustee will not affect the property he holds in trust. (Hart v. Burnett , 15 Cal.…