From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wharton v. DuBose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 7, 1984
458 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-1074.

November 7, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Indian River County, William L. Hendry, J.

G. Russell Petersen of G. Russell Petersen, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellants.

Clifford M. Miller of Miller Miller, Vero Beach, for appellee.


ON MOTION TO DISMISS


We dismiss this appeal of the trial court's order granting a motion for rehearing because it is an interlocutory appeal of which this court lacks jurisdiction. The First District Court of Appeal dismissed a similar appeal on the same ground in Ford Motor Company v. Averill, 355 So.2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We are aware of no change in the law since the Averill decision that would affect the outcome.

Appellant contends that an order granting a motion for rehearing either is a final order and thus immediately appealable, or is the equivalent of an order for a new trial, governed by section 59.04, Florida Statutes (1983), and post- Averill revisions of Rules 9.130(a)(4) and 9.140(c)(1)(C), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, as explicated by In re Emergency Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure, 381 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1980). We are not persuaded. Grant of a motion for rehearing is clearly not a final order, nor is it within the contemplation of the above authorities cited by appellant. Because it also falls outside the rubrics of Rule 9.130(a)(3), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which specifies immediately appealable non-final orders, we cannot hear this appeal at this time.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wharton v. DuBose

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 7, 1984
458 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Wharton v. DuBose

Case Details

Full title:JIM WHARTON AND ETH-WHA, INC., APPELLANTS, v. GEORGIA F. DuBOSE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 7, 1984

Citations

458 So. 2d 411 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Solman-Staropoli v. Califano

See Dolphin Cruise Line, Inc. v. Rubin, 603 So.2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We dismiss the appeal from the…

Peacon v. Peacon

Accordingly, the trial court's subsequent denial of the former husband's motion for rehearing was also not an…