Whaley v. Department of Corrections

Full title: LESLIE A. WHALEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 12, 1993

852 P.2d 200 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

852 P.2d 200

Opinion

CA A69239

Submitted on record and briefs March 19, 1993

Rules held valid May 12, 1993

Judicial Review of Administrative Rules.

Leslie A. Whaley, Salem, filed the brief pro se.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Rules held valid.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner challenges the validity of OAR 291-158-005; OAR 291-158-010; OAR 291-158-015 and OAR 291-158-015(10) as not having been adopted in compliance with the notice provision of ORS 183.335(2)(a) and OAR chapter 291, division 1. The notice given complied with the applicable statute and administrative rules.

Rules held valid.