Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Whaley v. Anderson

458 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Whaley v. Anderson

2 Citing cases

  1. Whaley v. Anderson

    461 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. 1990)   Cited 2 times

    November 2, 1990. Rehearing Denied November 27, 1990. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, 458 N.W.2d 155. Steven J. Pfefferle, Murnane, Conlin, White, Brandt Hoffman, St. Paul, for appellants.

  2. Stelling v. Hanson Silo Co.

    563 N.W.2d 286 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Finding no joint venture between a corporation and its shareholder because they already had a legal relationship

    While Gilbert Stelling asserts that appellants should have presented some evidence that he violated some industry standard or that his conduct was unreasonable, issues of breach and causation are generally fact issues for a jury to decide. See Whaley v. Anderson, 458 N.W.2d 155, 158 (Minn.App. 1990). Thus, sufficient evidence exists to present the issue of Gilbert Stelling's negligence to a jury.