From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whalen v. Van Brunt

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 4, 2003
817 A.2d 805 (Del. 2003)

Opinion

No. 441, 2002

Submitted: December 26, 2002

Decided: February 4, 2003

Court Below-Family Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County Petition Nos. 00-21066; 01-19035 File Nos. 01-06-01TS CS96-03152


Affirmed.

Unpublished opinion is below.

LAWRENCE P. WHALEN, Respondent Below-Appellant, v. MARTHA C. VAN BRUNT, Petitioner Below-Appellee. No. 441, 2002 In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: December 26, 2002 Decided: February 4, 2003

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH and STEELE, Justices

E. Norman Veasey, Chief Justice:

ORDER

This 4th day of February 2003, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record below, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Family Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its orders dated July 9, 2002 and November 26, 2001. There was no abuse of discretion or error of law in the Family Court's July 9, 2002 order terminating the appellant's parental rights and denying the appellant's petition for visitation. There was, furthermore, no abuse of discretion or error of law in the Family Court's November 26, 2001 order denying appellant's motion to appoint counsel.

FAM. CT. CIV. PROC. R. 204.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Whalen v. Van Brunt

Supreme Court of Delaware
Feb 4, 2003
817 A.2d 805 (Del. 2003)
Case details for

Whalen v. Van Brunt

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE P. WHALEN, Respondent Below-Appellant, v. MARTHA C. VAN BRUNT…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Feb 4, 2003

Citations

817 A.2d 805 (Del. 2003)