From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whalen v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

July, 1916.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rule 36 of the General Rules of Practice is, by its express terms, applicable only after an issue of fact has been joined. Section 480 of the Code of Civil Procedure states the proper remedy. It is within the legitimate discretion of the Special Term to deny, upon the terms prescribed in the order, a motion made under that section. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Whalen v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Whalen v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY WHALEN and ELLEN WHALEN, as Administratrices, etc., of PETER QUIRK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1916

Citations

174 App. Div. 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)