From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weygandt v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 9, 2012
File No. 2:12 CV 35 (D. Vt. Oct. 9, 2012)

Opinion

File No. 2:12 CV 35

10-09-2012

Norman Weygandt, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Pallito, Al Cormier, Fred Gorham, and Officer Dingham, Respondents.


ORDER

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed September 18, 2012. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 18) is GRANTED. Mr. Weygandt is hereby allowed thirty (30) days to file an Amended Complaint. Failure to file an Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of this case with prejudice.

Dated at Burlington, in the District of Vermont, this 9th day of October, 2012.

________________________

William K. Sessions III

District Court Judge


Summaries of

Weygandt v. Pallito

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT
Oct 9, 2012
File No. 2:12 CV 35 (D. Vt. Oct. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Weygandt v. Pallito

Case Details

Full title:Norman Weygandt, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Pallito, Al Cormier, Fred Gorham…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

Date published: Oct 9, 2012

Citations

File No. 2:12 CV 35 (D. Vt. Oct. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Lefebvre v. Mickel

The exhaustion inquiry thus requires that [a court] look at the state prison procedures and the prisoner's…