From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wexner v. Gruenapple

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1908
127 App. Div. 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)

Opinion

June 18, 1908.

Herman Weiss, for the appellant.

Henry J. Mayers, for the respondent.


The plaintiff, a member of the defendant lodge, has recovered a judgment for sick benefits for thirteen weeks, amounting to seventy dollars. One of the defendant's by-laws, prepared by a committee of which the plaintiff was a member, provided: "Sick benefit is payable only then when the elected physician of the Lodge and the Sick Committee reports a member sick and unable to work."

The plaintiff does not assert that he was not bound by said by-law, and it is undisputed that the physician of the lodge refused to make the required certificate, but certified to the contrary. Something is said respecting an appeal to the grand lodge, and a decision by that body, but there is no proper proof of such a decision or of any law of the order respecting its effect.

The judgment must be reversed.

WOODWARD, JENKS, HOOKER and GAYNOR, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

Wexner v. Gruenapple

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1908
127 App. Div. 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
Case details for

Wexner v. Gruenapple

Case Details

Full title:IKE WEXNER, Respondent, v . DANIEL GRUENAPPLE, as President of BEER MEISEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1908

Citations

127 App. Div. 179 (N.Y. App. Div. 1908)
111 N.Y.S. 280