From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wexler v. Maurer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

March, 1932.

Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.


Order modified by providing that Emil W. and Samuel Wexler shall be deemed plaintiffs and Andrew and Katherine Maurer defendants in the consolidated action, the claim of Katherine Maurer to be treated in the same way as though it were a counterclaim. The right of Emil and Samuel Wexler to be treated as plaintiffs as to all the claims involved rests on the earlier commencement of the actions in which they were plaintiffs taken in connection with the fact that they were the respondents at Special Term upon the motion to consolidate. As to Katherine Maurer, who joined with Andrew Maurer in the motion to consolidate, she should be treated as a defendant with a counterclaim. The right to open and close is to be given to the plaintiffs Emil and Samuel Wexler. All concur.


Summaries of

Wexler v. Maurer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Wexler v. Maurer

Case Details

Full title:EMIL W. WEXLER, Appellant, v. ANDREW MAURER, Respondent, and Three…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)