From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wetzel v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB

11-04-2013

ANDREW DAVID WETZEL (#539179) v. HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

On May 16, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff Andrew Wetzel's complaint be dismissed for failure to pay the Court's filing fee (Doc. 8). Plaintiff was ordered to pay the full amount of the Court's filing fee within 21 days of the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the report and recommendation.

Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge's Report, the record, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report is correct, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 8) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court's filing fee.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 4th day of November, 2013.

___________________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Wetzel v. Prince

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 4, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Wetzel v. Prince

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW DAVID WETZEL (#539179) v. HOWARD PRINCE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 4, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00228-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 4, 2013)