From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wettle v. United States Postal Serv.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 31, 2022
3:22-cv-828 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-828

08-31-2022

Brent A. Wettle, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States Postal Service, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge

Michelle M. Baeppler, the First Assistant United States Attorney acting “pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2679, and by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Attorney General under 28 C.F.R. § 15.3,” has certified that she has “read the Complaint in this action” and concluded that “[o]n the basis of the information now available with respect to the incident alleged therein, ... the individual Defendant, Lindsey McDonald, was acting within the scope of employment as an employee of the United States Postal Service, at the time of the alleged incident.” (Doc. No. 12-1). Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1), the United States is substituted as the party Defendant for those claims asserted against McDonald in this action.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Wettle v. United States Postal Serv.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 31, 2022
3:22-cv-828 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Wettle v. United States Postal Serv.

Case Details

Full title:Brent A. Wettle, et al., Plaintiffs, v. United States Postal Service, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-828 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 31, 2022)