From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westphal v. Grey. Lin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 2006
32 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-07153.

August 8, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated June 15, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and denied, as academic, their cross motion for an open commission to take a nonparty deposition.

Ahmuty, Demers McManus, Albertson, N.Y. (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for appellants.

Subin Associates, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Herbert S. Subin of counsel), and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac De Cicco, New York, N.Y. (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent (one brief filed).

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Covello, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff established a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of the defendants' liability ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 325). Any minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the plaintiffs witnesses were insufficient in this case to raise a bona fide issue as to their credibility ( see Coughlin v Bartnick, 293 AD2d 509 [2002]).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Westphal v. Grey. Lin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 2006
32 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Westphal v. Grey. Lin

Case Details

Full title:KIRSTEN E. WESTPHAL, Respondent, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 8, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6158
820 N.Y.S.2d 613

Citing Cases

Fox v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.

ut" from under him while he was replacing the light fixture transformer ( see McCaffery v Wright Co. Constr.,…