From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westover v. Doust

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1336 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1336 LKK GGH P.

May 15, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances at this time. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 13, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Westover v. Doust

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 15, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1336 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)
Case details for

Westover v. Doust

Case Details

Full title:GLEN A. WESTOVER, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR DOUST, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 15, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1336 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2007)