From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westover v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-816-Y (N.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-816-Y

12-13-2012

TIMOTHY A. WESTOVER v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 16, 2012, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("the findings") in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiff Timothy A. Westover's claims for disability-insurance and supplemental-security-income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Westover filed his objections to the findings on November 30.

After review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commis-sioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Westover v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-816-Y (N.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Westover v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY A. WESTOVER v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-816-Y (N.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rollins v. Berryhill

"In making an RFC assessment, the ALJ must consider all symptoms, including pain, and the extent to which…

Brown v. Saul

The ALJ addressed Brown's Paragraph B limitations in the RFC by limiting him to detailed, but not complex,…