From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westlund v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 19, 1990
571 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2120.

December 19, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County, John G. Ferris, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Frederick Westlund appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine, conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and delivery of cocaine. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an adequate Richardson hearing when it discovered that a taped interview of a codefendant had not been released to defense counsel. We reverse.

The record reveals that the trial court recognized the discovery violation, but failed to conduct an inquiry pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971). The failure to conduct such an inquiry constitutes per se reversible error. See Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1986). We find no merit in appellant's other points on appeal.

Accordingly, we reverse appellant's convictions and remand for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Westlund v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 19, 1990
571 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Westlund v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK WESTLUND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 19, 1990

Citations

571 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)