From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westley v. Oclaro, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
C11-02448-EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

C11-02448-EMC. No. C11-02448-EMC (NC) Lead Case No. C11-3176-EMC (NC)

05-02-2013

CURTIS AND CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. OCLARO, INC., et al., Defendants. In re OCLARO, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: Westley v. Oclaro, Inc., et al.

Gidon M. Caine (Cal. State Bar No. 188110) ALSTON & BIRD LLP Jessica P. Corley (admitted pro hac vice ) Andrew T. Sumner (admitted pro hac vice ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP Attorneys for Defendants OCLARO, INC., ALAIN COUDER, JERRY TURIN, and JAMES HAYNES Shawn A. Williams (213113) Sunny S. Sarkis (258073) ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Julie A. Kearns ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs


Gidon M. Caine (Cal. State Bar No. 188110)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
Jessica P. Corley (admitted pro hac vice)
Andrew T. Sumner (admitted pro hac vice)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
OCLARO, INC., ALAIN COUDER,
JERRY TURIN, and JAMES HAYNES
Shawn A. Williams (213113)
Sunny S. Sarkis (258073)
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP
Julie A. Kearns
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD
LLP
Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

and related consolidated action

(Lead Case No. C11-3176-EMC)

(Derivative Action)


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PARTIALLY STAYING MATTER

WHEREAS, on May 19, 2011, plaintiffs Curtis and Charlotte Westley filed a complaint (Dkt. No. 1) against defendants Oclaro, Inc., Alain Couder, Jerry Turin, and James Haynes;

WHEREAS, on September 12, 2011, this Court issued an Order Granting Connecticut Laborers' Pension Fund's Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and Approval of Selection of Counsel;

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2012, lead plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws ("SAC");

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2012, this Court issued an Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, on January 10, 2013, this Court issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration finding that the SAC had adequately alleged claims arising from alleged false statements in May and June 2010 (Dkt. No. 107);

WHEREAS, on January 30, 2013, this Court entered a minute order, that inter alia limited discovery to the issue of scienter with respect to certain statements and setting a discovery cutoff, a deadline for the filing of a Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"), briefing schedules in connection with defendants' motion to dismiss the TAC and defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to scienter for the May and June statements, and an oral argument date for the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 111);

WHEREAS, on March 1, 2013, lead plaintiff filed a TAC (Dkt. No. 121);

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the TAC (Dkt. No. 130);

WHEREAS, oral argument on defendants' motion to dismiss the TAC is currently scheduled for May 16, 2013;

WHEREAS, on April 3, 2013, this Court ordered inter alia, that defendants to produce certain documents by April 24, 2013, and to make a witness or witnesses available for deposition to testify on topics defined in lead plaintiff's Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice (Dkt. No. 138);

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed, subject to this Court's approval, to partially stay this matter, including discovery deadlines, until such time as this Court renders a decision on the motion to dismiss in order to obtain greater clarity on the ultimate scope of the litigation; and

WHEREAS, the parties enter this stipulation, not for the purposes of delay, but to efficiently manage this case going forward;

NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned parties, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. All proceedings and deadlines in this matter are stayed, with the exception of proceedings related to the motion to dismiss the TAC, and the discovery to be produced on May 1, 2013, until after this Court decides defendants' motion to dismiss the TAC.

2. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or ordered by this Court, the January 30, 2013 Order is hereby modified to provide that (i) the discovery cutoff shall be five weeks after this Court rules on defendants' motion to dismiss the TAC; (ii) defendants' summary judgment motion shall be filed no later than fourteen days after the discovery cutoff; and (iii) a hearing on the motion shall be set for the first Thursday on which Judge Chen is available, at 1:30 p.m., which is at least thirty-five days after the motion for summary judgment is filed. DATED: San Francisco, California

May 1, 2013

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

________________________

SHAWN A. WILLIAMS

SUNNY S. SARKIS

Post Montgomery Center

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: 415/288-4545

415/288-4534 (fax)

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN

& DOWD LLP

JULIE A. KEARNS

655 West Broadway, Suite 1900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: 619/231-1058

619/231-7423 (fax)

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

ROBERT M. CHEVERIE & ASSOCIATES

GREGORY S. CAMPORA

Commerce Center One

333 E. River Drive, Suite 101

East Hartford, CT 06108

Telephone: 860/290-9610

860/290-9611 (fax)

HOLZER HOLZER & FISTEL, LLC

MICHAEL I. FISTEL, JR.

200 Ashford Center North, Suite 300

Atlanta, GA 30338

Telephone: 770/392-0090

770/392-0029 (fax)

DYER & BERENS LLP

ROBERT J. DYER III

JEFFREY A. BERENS

303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 810

Denver, CO 80203

Telephone: 303/861-1764

303/395-0393 (fax)

Additional Counsel for Plaintiff DATED: Menlo Park, California

May 1, 2013

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

________________________

GIDON M. CAINE

275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150

Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008

Telephone: 650/838-2000

650/838-2001 (fax)

Jessica P. Corley (admitted pro hac vice)

Andrew T. Sumner (admitted pro hac vice)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424

Telephone: (404) 881-7000

Facsimile: (404) 881-7777

jessica.corley@alston.com

Attorneys for Defendants

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY. Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Gidon M. Caine, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

________________________

GIDON M. CAINE (CAL. STATE BAR NO. 188110)

* * *


ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Westley v. Oclaro, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 2, 2013
C11-02448-EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Westley v. Oclaro, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS AND CHARLOTTE WESTLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

C11-02448-EMC (N.D. Cal. May. 2, 2013)