From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westinghouse Elec. v. Shafer Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 25, 1987
515 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2193.

August 25, 1987. Rehearing Denied November 25, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harold R. Vann, J.

Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson Casey and Jeffrey A. O'Keefe, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Rosenberg, Reisman Glass and James Glass and Michael L. Dennis, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


The trial court, having determined that Shafer Miller, Inc. had tendered an offer of settlement to Westinghouse Electric Corporation in an amount greater than the verdict subsequently returned by a jury, correctly held that Westinghouse was not entitled to attorney's fees as a prevailing party under section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1985). See Greenough v. Aetna Casualty Sur. Co., 449 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); cf. C.U. Assocs., Inc. v. R.B. Grove, Inc., 472 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 1985) (construing section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1981)). As the remaining points presented do not merit discussion, the judgment under review is affirmed.


Summaries of

Westinghouse Elec. v. Shafer Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 25, 1987
515 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Westinghouse Elec. v. Shafer Miller

Case Details

Full title:WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. SHAFER MILLER, INC. AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 25, 1987

Citations

515 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Willey v. M.K. Roark, Inc.

In the instant case we hold that the trial court erred when it denied Willey's attorney's fees under C.U.…

Danis Ind. v. Ground Imp. Techniques

In construing these statutes, our courts have established that a prevailing insured is one who obtains a…