From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Golden Phx. Rest., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 4, 2017
CAUSE NO.: 2:17-CV-7-RL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Oct. 4, 2017)

Opinion

CAUSE NO.: 2:17-CV-7-RL-PRC

10-04-2017

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN PHOENIX RESTAURANT, INC., EVELYN HUYNH, QUYNH PHUNG, and ANTHONY PARDUCCI, Defendants. AMERICAN FAMILY INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Intervene [DE 40], filed by American Family Insurance Company on September 19, 2017. American Family Insurance Company moves to intervene in this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(c) requires that a motion to intervene "state the grounds for intervention and be accompanied by a pleading that sets out the claim or defense for which intervention is sought." Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(c). American Family Insurance Company did not attach a copy of the requisite pleading.

Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES without prejudice the Motion to Intervene [DE 40].

SO ORDERED this 4th day of October, 2017.

s/ Paul R. Cherry

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Golden Phx. Rest., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Oct 4, 2017
CAUSE NO.: 2:17-CV-7-RL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Oct. 4, 2017)
Case details for

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Golden Phx. Rest., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN PHOENIX RESTAURANT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

CAUSE NO.: 2:17-CV-7-RL-PRC (N.D. Ind. Oct. 4, 2017)