From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Dresdner

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Sep 2, 2021
21-cv-1753 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 2, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-1753

09-02-2021

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Plaintiff, v. DAVID DRESDNER, et al., Defendants.


Exhibit B

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (Proposed)

Ronald A. Guzman U.S. District Judge

This cause coming before the Court on the Agreed Motion of Plaintiff, Westfield Insurance Company (“Westfield”), for Entry of Declaratory Judgment Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, with the Court being advised in the premises, it is hereby ordered:

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Westfield and against Defendants, David Dresdner, Sherwood Blitstein, Richard Blatt and Mosaic Springhill, LLC. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, the Court finds and declares that Westfield owes no duty to defend or duty to indemnify Defendants, David Dresdner, Sherwood Blitstein, Richard Blatt or Mosaic Springhill, LLC with respect to any of the underlying complaints filed in that certain lawsuit, entitled Kai, et al. v. Board of Directors of Spring Hill Building 1 Condominium Association, Inc., et al., Case No. 2018 CH 960 in the Circuit Court of Du Page County, Illinois, referenced in Westfield's Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, or the events alleged in said underlying complaints.

This Judgment resolves all matters in controversy in this action. The Parties are to each bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.


Summaries of

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Dresdner

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Sep 2, 2021
21-cv-1753 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Westfield Ins. Co. v. Dresdner

Case Details

Full title:WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Plaintiff, v. DAVID…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Sep 2, 2021

Citations

21-cv-1753 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 2, 2021)