From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Westfall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Oct 22, 2019
588 S.W.3d 886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107057

10-22-2019

Joshua WESTFALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT, Jedd C. Schneider, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203. FOR RESPONDENT, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT, Jedd C. Schneider, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J. and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joshua Westfall ("Movant") appeals a motion court’s judgment denying his pro se Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 (2017). Movant failed to meet the burden of the performance prong under the Strickland test and failed to prove the remaining claims on appeal. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2) (2018).

Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)


Summaries of

Westfall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Oct 22, 2019
588 S.W.3d 886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Westfall v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joshua WESTFALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Oct 22, 2019

Citations

588 S.W.3d 886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)