From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Mgmt

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 23, 2011
NO. CIV. S-10-2896 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-10-2896 KJM-KJN.

August 23, 2011


ORDER


R.N. Fulstone Company and the Flying M Ranch have sought to intervene in this action as defendants; neither plaintiffs nor the defendant Bureau of Land Management (BLM) oppose the request. Both parties have filed timely applications, have shown that the status of their grazing permits may be affected by this action, and that the BLM does not adequately represent their interests. Wilderness Society v. United States Forest Service, 630 F.3d 1173, 1177 (9th Cir. 2011). Their motions to intervene as a matter of right are well-taken. FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a). The court declines to impose a requirement that they file joint briefs.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motions to intervene filed by R.N. Fulstone and the Flying M Ranch (ECF Nos. 23 25) are granted.


Summaries of

Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Mgmt

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 23, 2011
NO. CIV. S-10-2896 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land Mgmt

Case Details

Full title:WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT; WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiffs, v. BUREAU OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 23, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV. S-10-2896 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2011)