From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2020
No. 3:19-CV-2522-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:19-CV-2522-K

08-13-2020

DAVID JAMES WEST, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss, filed January 6, 2020 (doc. 12), is GRANTED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's complaint will be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Signed August 13th , 2020.

/s/ _________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

West v. Trump

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 13, 2020
No. 3:19-CV-2522-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2020)
Case details for

West v. Trump

Case Details

Full title:DAVID JAMES WEST, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 13, 2020

Citations

No. 3:19-CV-2522-K (N.D. Tex. Aug. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Ades v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury

"Although a particular method of giving notice is not required, plaintiffs usually give notice [under the…