From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 7, 2000
758 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-2538.

Opinion filed June 7, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Stanley M. Goldstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-11074 CF10A.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jennifer R. Haymes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for appellee.


Derrick Devon West, the appellant, was charged with robbery with a firearm. Pursuant to a negotiated plea, West pled nolo contendere to the lesser included offense of strong arm robbery and was sentenced as an habitual violent felony offender to twenty years Florida State Prison with a ten-year mandatory minimum and to a fifteen-year mandatory minimum as a prison releasee reoffender. On appeal, West contends that sentencing him as both an habitual violent felony offender and a prison releasee reoffender for the same offense violates double jeopardy. For the reasons expressed in West's companion appeal, case number 4D99-2537, we agree that the imposition of the dual sentences violates double jeopardy principles. West's sentence, however, is the result of a negotiated plea with the State. And, while it is generally true that "a defendant may not agree to an illegal sentence and may even challenge on appeal a negotiated sentence which is illegal," see Peeples v. State, 698 So.2d 910, 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), the supreme court has carved out an exception for double jeopardy claims. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607, 609 (Fla. 1994) ("The general rule is that a plea of guilty and subsequent adjudication of guilt precludes a later double jeopardy attack on the conviction and sentence."); Collins v. State, 732 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA) (holding that defendant's claim that her conviction and sentence violated double jeopardy was waived when she entered into a negotiated plea with the State), review granted, 744 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1999); Colson v. State, 717 So.2d 554, 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) ("Constitutional double jeopardy protections can be waived in a plea agreement if a defendant bargains for the terms and is aware of the length and nature of the sentences."). Thus, by entering into the negotiated plea with the State, West has waived his double jeopardy claim.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

West v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 7, 2000
758 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

West v. State

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK WEST, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 7, 2000

Citations

758 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

SAPP v. STATE

However, unlike the defendant in Huss, Appellant here failed to challenge the information prior to his felony…

Flynn v. State

Id. at 958. Likewise, the two cases cited in the concurring opinion in support of a waiver argument, Novaton…