From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 26, 2011
311 Ga. App. 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. A11A0898.

2011-08-26

WESTv.The STATE.

Stephen Glenn Adkins, Valdosta, for appellant.J. David Miller, Dist. Atty., Brian Allen McDaniel, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.


Stephen Glenn Adkins, Valdosta, for appellant.J. David Miller, Dist. Atty., Brian Allen McDaniel, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

Jarvis West appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Since West's motion was untimely filed, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Therefore, the denial of the motion was proper, and we affirm.

The record shows that on August 7, 2009, West entered a negotiated guilty plea to burglary. The trial court entered a judgment of conviction and sentence on August 12, 2009. Approximately one year later, on August 3, 2010, West filed a pro se motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Following a hearing, the trial court denied the motion, from which West appeals.

The denial of West's motion was required since it was filed untimely.

“It is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.” (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Curry v. State, 274 Ga.App. 19, 616 S.E.2d 225 (2005). See also McKiernan v. State, 286 Ga. 756, 757, 692 S.E.2d 340 (2010) (“[T]he trial court loses jurisdiction if the motion to withdraw the plea is not made within the term in which the plea is entered and the defendant sentenced.”).

We note that the trial court erroneously considered and denied West's motion on its substantive merits. As explained herein, the trial court should have denied the motion as untimely. Nevertheless, we will affirm the trial court's decision when it is right for any reason. See Mathis v. State, 279 Ga. 100, 102(3)(a), 610 S.E.2d 62 (2005); Volz v. State, 306 Ga.App. 763, 766, 703 S.E.2d 354 (2010).

Here, West

“An exception exists if a defendant challenges a void sentence [.] ... In that case, the defendant may withdraw his guilty plea as of right, even following the expiration of the term of court in which the void sentence was pronounced.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Spencer v. State, 309 Ga.App. 629, 630(2), 710 S.E.2d 837. See also Kaiser v. State, 285 Ga.App. 63, 68–69(1), 646 S.E.2d 84 (2007). The exception is inapplicable here, however, since West does not contend that his sentence was void.

pled guilty and was sentenced during the trial court's August 2009 term of court.

That term had expired before West filed his motion to withdraw his guilty plea on August 3, 2010. Consequently, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of his plea. See Richardson v. State, 306 Ga.App. 269(1), 701 S.E.2d 908 (2010); Curry, supra, 274 Ga.App. at 19–20, 616 S.E.2d 225.

The terms of court for the Superior Court of Colquitt County commence on the first Monday in February and August. See OCGA § 15–6–3(35)(B).

Under these circumstances, [West's] only available means to withdraw his guilty plea is through habeas corpus proceedings. [West's] motion to withdraw his guilty plea, however, cannot be construed to be a habeas corpus petition because it was filed in the county where he was convicted rather than against the warden in the county where he is incarcerated. The trial court therefore did not err in denying [West's] untimely motion to withdraw his guilty plea.(Footnotes omitted.) Curry, supra, 274 Ga.App. at 20, 616 S.E.2d 225.

Judgment affirmed.

ELLINGTON, C.J., and DOYLE, J., concur.


Summaries of

West v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Aug 26, 2011
311 Ga. App. 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

West v. State

Case Details

Full title:WEST v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Aug 26, 2011

Citations

311 Ga. App. 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011)
716 S.E.2d 727
11 FCDR 2775