From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 26, 1925
104 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

7 Div. 113.

May 26, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cherokee County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

Frank M. Savage, of Center, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for unlawfully possessing prohibited liquors. On this appeal the only insistence of error is that the state failed to meet the required burden of proof. Upon the trial of the case no exceptions were reserved, and the evidence was without conflict, as only two witnesses were examined by the state, and no testimony was offered by the defendant. The two state witnesses testified to sufficient facts to warrant the verdict and sustain the judgment, if their testimony was worthy of belief, and nothing appears to the contrary. The insistence of error by counsel for appellant cannot be sustained. Let the judgment of conviction appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.


Summaries of

West v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 26, 1925
104 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

West v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tiance WEST v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 26, 1925

Citations

104 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
20 Ala. App. 701