From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Michele Pommier Models, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 30, 1996
681 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-573.

October 30, 1996.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert P. Kaye, Judge.

Ferrell Fertel, P.A. and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Herzfeld Rubin and Daniel L. Koch, Miami, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, GODERICH and GREEN, JJ.


This is an appeal from the denial of appellant's motion to vacate a default and default judgment entered pursuant thereto as well as a motion for rehearing. We reverse upon our finding in the record that appellant established both excusable neglect for not timely responding to the complaint and a meritorious defense to the action. Furthermore, he responded diligently upon learning of the default and default judgment. E.g., Sanchez v. Horrell, 660 So.2d 366, 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Inter-Atlantic Ins. Servs., Inc. v. Hernandez, 632 So.2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Given the well established preference in the law for resolving disputes on the merits, Hanft v. Church, 671 So.2d 249, 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (citing North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 853 (Fla. 1962)), we conclude that the trial court grossly abused its discretion when it declined to set aside the default and default judgment and denied the motion for rehearing.

Reversed for further proceedings.


Summaries of

West v. Michele Pommier Models, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 30, 1996
681 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

West v. Michele Pommier Models, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOEL WEST, APPELLANT, v. MICHELE POMMIER MODELS, INC., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 30, 1996

Citations

681 So. 2d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Feinberg

Florida has a long-standing policy in favor of trials on the merits. See North Shore Hospital, Inc. v.…