From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 26, 2006
C.A. No. 05-561 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 26, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. No. 05-561.

June 26, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2006, after the plaintiff, Patricia West, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was filed by plaintiff, and a Motion for Summary Judgment was submitted by the defendant, Lincoln Benefit Life Company, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff and the response thereto filed by the defendant, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket No. 22] is DENIED and the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 23] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party desires to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 26, 2006
C.A. No. 05-561 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 26, 2006)
Case details for

West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA WEST, Plaintiff, v. LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 26, 2006

Citations

C.A. No. 05-561 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

West v. Benefit Life Co.

Mrs. West's admitted lack of knowledge is insufficient to rebut the presumption that correspondence mailed in…