West v. Foster

Full title: MERRY WEST, Petitioner, v. SHERYL FOSTER, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ (D. Nev. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-CV-02086-JCM-RJJ.

March 23, 2011

ORDER

JAMES MAHAN, District Judge

Presently before the court is respondents Sheryl Foster, et al's first motion for enlargement of time. (Doc. # 10). In the motion (doc. #10), respondents request a forty-five (45) day enlargement of time in order for them to file a responsive pleading to petitioner's petition for writ habeas corpus. A response to the petition was due on March 17, 2011.

In the affidavit of Jason R. Dworin (doc. #10), respondents seek an enlargement of time due to the fact that counsel received the record for the case on March 2, 2011, and need additional time to review the documents. Further, counsel asserts that he had a response due in another case on March 17, 2011, which required his attention as well.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that respondents' motion for enlargement of time (doc. # 10), be and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Respondents must file a responsive pleading to petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus and any pending motion by May 2, 2011.