From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3147 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3147 FCD DAD P.

October 11, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court is petitioner's motion for a court order allowing discovery, for an evidentiary hearing, and for appointment of counsel.

The court has addressed virtually identical motions from petitioner on several occasions and has explained to petitioner what he is required to show before the court can issue an order granting him relief. (See Orders Filed Aug. 12, 2010 (Doc. No. 30) Apr. 21, 2011 (Doc. No. 55).) Once more, petitioner's pending motion fails to demonstrate that discovery, an evidentiary hearing, or appointment of counsel are warranted in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion (Doc. No. 64) is denied.

DATED: October 7, 2011.


Summaries of

West v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3147 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

West v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:MACK A WEST, JR., Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3147 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)