From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M.C. W. v. 2343, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 5, 2015
126 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

14448N, 16849/07

03-05-2015

AMIR M.C.W., an Infant by his Mother and Natural Guardian, CARLENE C.F., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. 2343, INC., Defendant–Appellant.

Marshall Conway & Bradley, P.C., New York (Robert J. Conway of counsel), for appellant. Fitzgerald Law Firm, P.C., Yonkers (John M. Daly of counsel), for respondents.


Marshall Conway & Bradley, P.C., New York (Robert J. Conway of counsel), for appellant.

Fitzgerald Law Firm, P.C., Yonkers (John M. Daly of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered on or about October 3, 2013, which denied defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for its default in appearance at the inquest. The record shows, with a valid affidavit of service, that defendant and its property manager were served with an order dated October 28, 2011, which adjourned the inquest to December 14, 2011. On that date the inquest went forward, and defendant's conclusory assertion that its failure to appear was due to non-receipt of the October 2011 order fails to rebut the presumption that plaintiff's attorney properly served the order, and that it was received (see Matter of Ariel Servs., Inc. v New York City Envtl. Control Bd., 89 A.D.3d 415, 931 N.Y.S.2d 857 [1st Dept. 2011] ).

Since defendant failed to set forth a reasonable excuse for its default, a necessary precondition to relief under CPLR 5015(a)(1), its motion to vacate the judgment must be denied, regardless of whether it presented a potentially meritorious defense (see M.R. v. 2526 Valentine LLC, 58 A.D.3d 530, 532, 871 N.Y.S.2d 131 [1st Dept.2009] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments, including its reliance on CPLR 317, and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

M.C. W. v. 2343, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 5, 2015
126 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

M.C. W. v. 2343, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Amir M.C. W., an Infant by his Mother and Natural Guardian, Carlene C. F.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 5, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2 N.Y.S.3d 358
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 1878

Citing Cases

Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co. v. Hereford Ins. Co.

At least two of Tri–State's multiple defaults lack a substantiated excuse—its failure to submit opposition,…