From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

West Point Pepperell v. Green

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 1979
252 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Summary

holding that compensation should not be denied based on a plant shutdown in light of the fact that Georgia determines partial disability benefits based on "the difference between [a worker's] average weekly wage before the injury and the average weekly wage she was able to earn thereafter"

Summary of this case from Utility Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Testerman

Opinion

56902.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 7, 1978.

DECIDED JANUARY 5, 1979.

Workers' compensation. Whitfield Superior Court. Before Judge Temples.

Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, George L. Pope, Jr., James T. McDonald, Jr., for appellant.

Brown, Harriss, Hartman Ruskaup, Don L. Hartman, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court which affirmed an award of the State Board of Worker's Compensation. Held:

The claimant was injured and was totally disabled for a period of time and during this period drew compensation under the provisions of Code Ann. § 114-404 (Code § 114-404, as amended through Ga. L. 1975, pp. 190, 193). Subsequent thereto she had a change in condition from total disability to partial disability. She then returned to work for her employer at a different job which was suitable to her impaired physical condition.

The board entered an award which granted the claimant compensation for partial disability. In determining the amount of compensation due the claimant the board awarded the claimant 66 2/3% of the difference between her average weekly wage before the injury and the average weekly wage she was able to earn thereafter. This was the proper method of computing the compensation due her under the provisions of Code Ann. § 114-405 (Code § 114-405, as amended through Ga. L. 1975, pp. 190, 194).

The employer contends that this was error because there were certain weeks subsequent to the time the claimant returned to the light work that she lost time from work not because of her condition or the fact that she was in a new job but because the entire plant was closed down. The employer argues that the claimant would have lost this time from work had she been in her old job and therefore she was not entitled to receive partial disability for the days she would not have been working even if she had not been injured.

While the employer's argument may have some merit, the only method provided by the statute is to use the average weekly wage before and after the injury. This could also in some cases result in the claimant receiving a smaller amount of compensation for partial disability if during the period prior to the injury he had lost some days from work because the plant was closed down. Then in that event his average weekly wage prior to the injury would be calculated at a reduced amount because of the days he lost from work. See Rule 405, State Board of Workers' Compensation, Computing Average Weekly Wage After Injury.

Judgment affirmed. Webb and McMurray, JJ., concur.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 7, 1978 — DECIDED JANUARY 5, 1979.


Summaries of

West Point Pepperell v. Green

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 1979
252 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

holding that compensation should not be denied based on a plant shutdown in light of the fact that Georgia determines partial disability benefits based on "the difference between [a worker's] average weekly wage before the injury and the average weekly wage she was able to earn thereafter"

Summary of this case from Utility Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Testerman

In Green, the average weekly wage the employee was able to earn after her injury was reduced by closure of the employer's plant.

Summary of this case from Shaw Indus., Inc. v. Shaw
Case details for

West Point Pepperell v. Green

Case Details

Full title:WEST POINT PEPPERELL v. GREEN

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 5, 1979

Citations

252 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
252 S.E.2d 55

Citing Cases

Shaw Indus., Inc. v. Shaw

In determining temporary partial disability benefits, the employer used the amounts resulting from its upward…

Utility Trailer Mfg. Co. v. Testerman

Other states with statutes similar to Code § 65.2-502 have recognized this same distinction between lost…