Opinion
January, 1915.
Present — Ingraham, P.J., Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. (McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented on Woodward v. New York Railways Co., 164 App. Div. 658.)
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Wessels v. Linch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1915
166 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Summaries of
Wessels v. Linch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1915
166 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for
Wessels v. Linch
Case Details
Full title:Bernard Wessels, Respondent, v. George W. Linch, as Receiver of the Second…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jan 1, 1915
Citations
166 App. Div. 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Citing Cases
Lopes v. Linch
" (p. 57.) The facts in this case are controlled by the decision in Wessels v. Linch ( 166 App. Div. 919;…