Summary
In Robin v. Brown, 1932, 308 Pa. 123, 162 A. 161, 162, the court said: "In the absence of an open and notorious actual use of land claimed by adverse possession, the claimant must show that it was so substantially and visibly fenced in and the fence was so continuously and substantially maintained * * * as to amount to an assertion * * * of his exclusive private ownership of that area of the earth's surface.
Summary of this case from Ringstad v. GrannisOpinion
May 26, 1932.
(Appeal, No. 137, Jan. T., 1932.)
The judgment of the court below in the above entitled case is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed to the case similarly entitled and indexed to No. 138, January Term, 1932.