From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesley v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 9, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0133 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0133 GGH P.

July 9, 2010


ORDER


On February 1, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #4). By order filed April 30, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the April 30th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the April 30, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Wesley v. Warden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 9, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0133 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Wesley v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW WESLEY, Plaintiff, v. J. WALKER, Warden, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 9, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0133 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2010)