From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weser v. Throne

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 812 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

June, 1901.

S. Sturtz, for appellant.

Black, Olcott, Gruber Bonynge, for respondents.


The positive testimony of the plaintiff's witness Stover, of having left the contract of rental and the account for the first month's rental, with a clerk of the hotel, is sufficient to establish the giving of the notice necessary to charge the defendants with knowledge that the piano was the property of the plaintiff and was not owned by the guest. This is clearly shown, notwithstanding the purely negative and somewhat contradictory testimony of hotel employees. Under the notice given, the defendants could not acquire any lien.

Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.


Summaries of

Weser v. Throne

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 812 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Weser v. Throne

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN S. WESER, Appellant, v . SYLVIA THRONE, Impleaded with ARTHUR J…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 812 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)