From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wescott v. Jackley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 4, 2022
CV 22-01615-SPG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-01615-SPG-AFM

10-04-2022

Carl A. Wescott, Plaintiff, v. Jessica Jackley et al Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)

SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On September 8, 2022, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A written response to the Order to Show Cause was ordered to be filed no later than September 22, 2022. No response having been filed to the Court's Order to Show Cause, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-entitled case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court, pursuant to Local Rule 41.


Summaries of

Wescott v. Jackley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Oct 4, 2022
CV 22-01615-SPG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Wescott v. Jackley

Case Details

Full title:Carl A. Wescott, Plaintiff, v. Jessica Jackley et al Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

CV 22-01615-SPG-AFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)