From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesch v. Yodlee, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
3:20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-05991-SK

10-26-2022

DEBORAH WESCH, DARIUS CLARK, JOHN H. COTTRELL, WILLIAM B. COTTRELL, GREG HERTIK, DAVID LUMB KYLA ROLLIER AND JENNY SZETO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. YODLEE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.


ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTION TO REPLY EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 7-11 AND 7-3 AND LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY

HONORABLE SALLIE KIM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Leave to File Objection to Reply Evidence Pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-3 and Leave to File Sur-Reply, and all other papers submitted in response thereto, hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' leave to file an Objection to Reply Evidence and Sur-Reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wesch v. Yodlee, Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
3:20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Wesch v. Yodlee, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH WESCH, DARIUS CLARK, JOHN H. COTTRELL, WILLIAM B. COTTRELL, GREG…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-05991-SK (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)