Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corp.

3 Citing cases

  1. Wertheim, LLC v. Currency Corp.

    70 Cal.App.5th 327 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    Wertheim appealed and we reversed, concluding that for timing purposes, a judgment is satisfied not when an appeal bond becomes available but when payment is actually tendered. ( Wertheim LLC v. Currency Corp . (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 1124, 248 Cal.Rptr.3d 211 ( Wertheim IV ).) We directed the trial court to consider the postjudgment motion "on the merits."

  2. Quiles v. Parent

    No. G056687 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    DISCUSSION We review issues of statutory interpretation and entitlement to attorney fees de novo. (Wertheim LLC v. Currency Corp. (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 1124, 1131.) I.

  3. Vischer AG v. Apollo Enter. Sols.

    B289410 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2019)

    Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to attorney fees under Swiss law for enforcing the Swiss judgment, and pursuant to the UFCMJRA therefore is entitled to those fees under California law as well. We review statutory entitlement to attorney fees de novo. (Wertheim LLC v. Currency Corp. (2019) 35 Cal.App.5th 1124, 1131.) Applying that standard of review, we reject plaintiff's argument.