From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Werner v. Nelkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1994
206 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Yachnin, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered February 11, 1993, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The defendant's receipt and retention of the plaintiff's invoices without objection within a reasonable period of time, gave rise to an actionable account stated entitling the plaintiff to summary judgment in his favor (see, Rockefeller Group v Edwards Hjorth, 164 A.D.2d 830; Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis Cohen v. Edelman, 160 A.D.2d 626; Fink, Weinberger, Fredman, Berman Lowell v. Petrides, 80 A.D.2d 781). The defendant's bald conclusory allegations in opposition were insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Werner v. Nelkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1994
206 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Werner v. Nelkin

Case Details

Full title:DONALD J. WERNER, Respondent, v. MYRON NELKIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 422 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 66

Citing Cases

Ziskin Law Firm v. Bi-County Elec

Moreover, upon review of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the defendants' cross…

Winson v. Coffin

Conclusory statements are insufficient. ( Sofsky v Rosenberg, 163 AD2d 240, aff'd 76 NY2d 927; Zuckerman v…