From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wentz v. Daley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1922 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1922 KJM EFB.

October 5, 2011


ORDER


This case, in which plaintiff was originally proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 3, 2011, attorney Glen A. Van Dyke filed a notice of substitution as plaintiff's counsel in this case, along with a proposed order that the undersigned will approve. Dckt. No. 8.

Because plaintiff is now represented by counsel, the referral to the magistrate judge will be withdrawn and the case will be referred back to the district judge. Therefore, all currently scheduled dates presently set before the undersigned will be vacated. The undersigned will, however, continue to perform the usual discovery tasks associated with ordinary civil cases.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The substitution of counsel filed October 3, 2011, Dckt. No. 8, is approved;

2. The referral of this case to the magistrate judge is withdrawn and the case is referred back to the district judge; and

3. The November 30, 2011 status (pretrial scheduling) conference, Dckt. No. 4, which is currently set before the undersigned, is vacated.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wentz v. Daley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1922 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Wentz v. Daley

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA WENTZ, Plaintiff, v. KATHRYN A. DALEY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1922 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)